Trying to understand - Art

Understand in order to be able to assess, is not the only way to be able to enjoy an art work, although the complicity that generates understanding it, Helps! I'm from the theory that not for having seen more art, you can feel more sensations, but getting to decode the message of the artist is a leap of satisfaction. To this end, there is only one way to learn, seeing, as in addition its worth to discuss and think on what you see, of course.

How to understand the aesthetic sensibility of an art work? Everyone gets to refer a thousand qualities as originality, expression, texture, etc. They all agree in calling it "quality of the work". Although I do not think that it is situated only in quality. How many artists have developed their own format, unbeatable at first and then totally flat. I will rather define it as the sensation of seeing something different, not defined by the technique but the soul of the piece and its transmission to us. There is a message in it, the one that we must try to translate, where the experience of the artist gets to see it’s truly intention. That’s why the market gives greater value to the great size works versus the small ones, and it’s because a large format demands more involvement of the artist against his work. In that connection, the complexity and the transmission is increased both by the use of a difficult prism and the implication of a physical position towards the art work. In conclusion both can only come from practice and the view or heart of the artist.

Master Lucio Muñoz: "You need to master the technique to be able to laugh at it"

I really like, as another explication on the abstraction of the relationship between work and artist, the one given by Miguel Tugores, founder of the fair DEARTE (Madrid-Medinaceli), when he analyses the capabilities of the human being.
"Stopping the time or getting out of it- - - The artist facing art, can get abstracted from the time and what for him meant a few minutes actually past 5 hours"